Building Transparency Documentation
  • Welcome
  • EC3
    • Getting Started
      • Project Quick Start Guide
    • Main Features
      • Find & Compare Materials
        • Using Specification Filters
        • Geographical Regions
      • Plan & Compare Buildings
        • Bill of Quantities
        • Units of Measure
        • Builders
        • Material Calculators
        • Data Validations
        • A4 Transportation Emissions
        • A5 Construction Phase Emissions
      • Level Bids
    • Material categories
      • Processed Glass
    • Managing Data
      • Add EPDs to EC3
      • Manage Data
      • Users & Permissions
      • Organizations
    • API & Integrations
    • FAQ
      • Pilot User FAQs
    • Glossary
    • Release Notes
      • 📝EC3 Updates - 18th June 2024
      • 📝EC3 Updates - 22nd May 2024
      • 📝EC3 Updates - April 2024
    • Enterprise Integration Guides
      • Setup Single Sign On (SSO) with SAML
  • Methodology
    • EPD Comparability
    • Uncertainty & Statistics
    • Project Planner
    • Reference Lines
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. EC3
  2. Main Features
  3. Plan & Compare Buildings

A4 Transportation Emissions

PreviousData ValidationsNextA5 Construction Phase Emissions

Last updated 7 months ago

A4 emissions, or transportation emissions, are associated with deliveries of materials from the point of manufacture to the jobsite. This includes activities such as ready-mix trucks delivering concrete to the jobsite, deliveries of steel and other materials. EC3 has an A4 calculator to help users easily convert fuel from these activities into emissions or global warming potential (GWP).

To access the A4 calculator, click on the "A4 Transport" tab in the building project planner. The materials, quantities, units, collections and EPDs that are populated in the "A1-A3 Manufacturing" tab will automatically carry over to the A4 calculator.

EC3 calculates the impact of transport from manufacturing plant to project site for each material. This result is then shown as A4 transportation impact. This calculation takes into account:

  1. product weight

  2. transportation mode(s)

  3. transportation distance(s)

Product weight is the mass per declared unit when available; otherwise EC3 calculates it from the default density for the product category. You can manually enter a more accurate product weight, for example to include packaging (if known).

Transportation mode defines the carbon footprint per ton of product transported over a km or mi distance, i.e., per * or *. Our and the associated impact factors come from regional LCA datasets, such as in the United States . Associated impacts are well-to-wheel, i.e., they include both fuel production and combustion emissions, unless noted otherwise in the transportation mode table.

Transportation distance can be custom calculated, but EC3 provides a default initial estimate.

If the user has selected a facility-specific product EPD, EC3 uses the straight-line distance from the manufacturing facility to the project site, plus a to account for the actual road, rail, and waterway routes .

If no product EPD is selected yet, EC3 uses a and mode for the general product category that was selected. These default values represent the typical distance based on national or regional data (e.g., U.S. in the United States ).

You can also enter specific info about multiple transportation modes and distances manually, where you have more complete information. We recommend as a resource.

To calculate the A4 transportation impact, we multiply:

GWP_a4_leg1 = product_weight * transport_mode_gwp_intensity * leg_distance

For multiple legs, each leg is calculated as above and results of all legs are summed:

GWP_a4_total = GWP_a4_leg1 + GWP _a4_leg2 + GWP_a4_leg3 + …

As usual, EC3 handles the unit conversions.

References

kgCO2e
t
km
ton
mi
list of transportation modes
USLCI
[1]
40% routing factor
[2]
default distance
Census Bureau’s Commodity Flow Survey
[3]
Ecotransit
[1] National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USLCI Database, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, CO, 2021.
[2] F.P. Boscoe, K.A. Henry, M.S. Zdeb, A nationwide comparison of driving distance versus straight-line distance to hospitals, Prof. Geogr. 64 (2012) 188–196.
[3] U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2017 Commodity Flow Survey, Washington, DC, 2020. www.census.gov /content/dam/Census/library /publications/2017/econ /ec17tcf-us.pdf.